BlueGriffon.org - Progress - Comments

Rotations, starts looking ok... - floogy

floogy — Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:43:38 +0200

Hey, that are great news! Blue Griffon seems to get useable. When do you plan to release a linux or windows update?

Rotations, starts looking ok... - Oscar

Oscar — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:42:30 +0200

Look great, I'm waiting a stable version of the software. When you'll release an update for linux? Good luck.

First proto of CSS 3 rotation in the viewport - Murz

Murz — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:23:37 +0200

Very cool! We can rotate images like this into wysiwyg editor on html page directly? Or open separate window to rotate?

Word count - gaby2300

gaby2300 — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:47:55 +0200

Hi,

Could you please contact me when this add.on is available?

Many thanks!
Best regards,
Gabriela

Progress 20100517 - kitanosawa

kitanosawa — Sun, 30 May 2010 07:54:10 +0200

I have great expectations

Progress 20100517 - Evening Dresses @ Ed

Evening Dresses @ Ed — Sat, 22 May 2010 18:24:50 +0200

when this project is gona complete??

Image dialog #2 - Elixon

Elixon — Wed, 12 May 2010 23:54:22 +0200

Looks great.

Just one thing... "CSS Policy" - should not this be a global setting? I can imagine this property in more dialogs and in real I don't see any particular reason why would user choose every time a different value...

Or maybe two things... the order of elements. I consider the @src, @width, @height, @alt/@title as most important. For sure I would not place the "CSS Extra Props" in the most exclusive area of the dialogue. It is just something "extra" (optional), right? Why not to put it as another tab right to the "Link"?

Image dialog #2 - Colby Russell

Colby Russell — Wed, 12 May 2010 17:28:47 +0200

The box shadow option says "Apply a box shadow (length in pixels)". But it looks like the unit is part of the text field. Am I correct in believing that you could change width, e.g., to "1em"? If so, that would result in the dialog text saying "lengths in pixels" when its really in ems. Even without, it seems like saying "lengths in pixels" is redundant if the units are included next to the values.

Another thing if the "lengths in pixels" phrase stays: shouldn't it say "dimensions in pixels"?

JSCSSP in BlueGriffon - voracity

voracity — Mon, 10 May 2010 06:36:51 +0200

Nice.

Does anyone know why Gecko doesn't do this automatically? (i.e. preserve unrecognized properties, at-rules, etc.) Internet Explorer does this, and it does it spectacularly well (obeying cascades, etc.) This makes adding CSS properties to IE via Javascript awesomely simple, while in Firefox it's a nightmare. (Not sure about Webkit, as I haven't done this kind of thing in a while.)

Progress 20100503 - mystictim

mystictim — Tue, 04 May 2010 20:51:32 +0200

Hi,

The work you are doing on Bluegriffon is very exiting and it will be wonderful to have a modern opensource web editor.

I'm having problems trying to compile Bluegriffon on Ubuntu Intrepid. I downloaded the source from http://sources.disruptive-innovatio... and followed the instructions in Build.txt downloading mozilla source code, creating a bluegriffon directory with the source code and copying mozconfig.linux to .mozconfig and then running make -f client.mk build

This results in quite a bit of activity but eventually halts with the following error:

RuntimeError: File "content/bluegriffon/utils/htmlParser.js" not found in /home/visitor/Software/192src/bluegriffon/base, .

Any help would be much appreciated.

Progress 20100430 - PsYhLo

PsYhLo — Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:36:41 +0200

why there is no build to test

Progress 20100429 - PsYhLo

PsYhLo — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:38:18 +0200

from where i can download this version

ActiveView - contractauction

contractauction — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:03:47 +0200

yes and please it will not take time to fix it..

JSCSSP #2 - Bart

Bart — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:04:01 +0100

It's quite coll to see Blue Griffon development goes on!

JSCSSP #2 - Colby Russell

Colby Russell — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:29:11 +0100

I was wondering how this was progressing, and was wondering today about the following: How are you reconciling the differences between DOM Level 2 Style and the not-yet-complete CSSOM? Your motivation for starting this was a manipulable object model for CSS that wasn't tied to Gecko's, and Gecko doesn't implement some of the things in DOM 2 Style. Will there be an option to choose the behavior you want?

It seems like one way to go would be to make a judgement call for conflicts, but which might seem like the best thing to do in the beginning, but I have a feeling that in the future, it's going to be one of those things where you're looking at a bug report, saying "We just can't handle this with the way we currently do things."

Script Inspector - Lexus

Lexus — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:06:22 +0100

can't wait to play with v.1 let me know if you need some evaluators or reviewers.

Editor weirdnesses - Lexus

Lexus — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:05:05 +0100

i doubt its a glitch

Bespin in BlueGriffon - Lexus HS 250

Lexus HS 250 — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:03:56 +0100

Quote":you can't embed direct Bespin in XUL because it uses innerHTML and that one fails inside a XUL document"
There has to be a work around. Has anyone checked the bp6 forum?

Resurrection - Lexus

Lexus — Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:01:42 +0100

Any update on this project? Any timetable for release?

Editor weirdnesses - Neil Rashbrook

Neil Rashbrook — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:09:51 +0100

The system principal overrides the global javascript and plugin preferences too, so I assume that the various checks aren't being done in the order most useful to you.